Verifying Grime Dice Experimentally
I got a set of non-transitive Grime dice from UK enterprise Maths Gear.
I have verified Grime dice with a monte carlo simulation, and calculated probabilities combinatorially, now I’m going to try to verify them experimentally.
James Grime has a 2-die cycle of who wins:

There’s 2 cycles in that diagram. I’m interested in the outer cycle, Blue → Red → Magenta → Yellow → Olive → Blue
And a single-die cycle:

Again, I’m interested in the outer cycle of the single-die game: Blue → Olive → Yellow → Magenta → Red → Blue
The two cycles are in opposite orders.
If I roll the dice 21 times, I’ll be able to pick out a winning cycle each way.
Procedure
I’m going to run the procedure with 5 dice (one of each color), and with 10 dice (two of each color), so I can see both cycles.
- Put 5 (10) dice in a cup.
- Shake cup 4 times with hand clamped over the top to prevent dice from spilling.
- Dump cup on the white lid of a Sterilite bin. It’s got a small lip preventing dice from ending up on the floor.
- Record each color of dice score (sum of 2 for the 10 dice experiment).
Repeat steps (1) through (4) 20 times, for a total of 21 rolls.
I’ll compare pairs of colors in the Blue → Red → Magenta → Yellow → Olive → Blue cycle. I won’t compare every combination. The winner of (for example) Blue and Red will be the die (or dice) with at least 11 of 21 victories. At that point I can draw diagrams of experimentally determined winner→loser cycles.
Experimental setup

10 Dice
| Blue | Red | Magenta | Yellow | Olive | Blue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 13 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 9 |
| 4 | 8 | 12 | 11 | 5 | 4 |
| 4 | 8 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 4 |
| 9 | 8 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 |
| 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
| 14 | 8 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 14 |
| 4 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| 14 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 14 |
| 9 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 9 |
| 14 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 14 |
| 9 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 10 | 9 |
| 9 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
| 9 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 9 |
| 9 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 9 |
| 4 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 |
| 4 | 13 | 7 | 16 | 5 | 4 |
| 14 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 14 |
| 9 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 5 | 9 |
| 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| 14 | 8 | 12 | 11 | 5 | 14 |
| 9 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 |
- Blue vs Red: blue, 12:9
- Red vs Magenta: red, 15:6
- Magenta vs Yellow: magenta, 13:8
- Yellow vs Olive: yellow, 15:6
- Olive vs Blue: olive, 13:8
2-die color winning cycle

That matches reasonably well with calculated probabilities:

I can not convince Circo to locate the colors consistently, but if you mentally rotate the graphs by a color, you can see the colors appear in the same order, and the colors win in the same direction.
5 Dice
| Blue | Red | Magenta | Yellow | Olive | Blue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 2 |
| 7 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 2 |
| 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 2 |
| 2 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| 2 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| 7 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 7 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 7 |
| 7 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 7 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| 7 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| 7 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 2 |
| 7 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
- Blue vs Red: red, 14:7
- Red vs Magenta: red, 12:9
- Magenta vs Yellow: yellow, 16:5
- Yellow vs Olive: olive, 12:9
- Olive vs Blue: blue, 11:10
Single die color winning cycle

This is not good agreement with calculated probabilities, or monte carlo simulation. Red beats both blue and magenta. The house usually, but not always, wins, I guess.